Prior to 2010, parties using international arbitration as the dispute resolution mechanism did not have an effective procedure relating to interim relief. The most important reason for parties opting for international arbitration is the party autonomy to select a neutral law and an arbitrator from a
Read more →
Choosing a neutral seat of Arbitration, is an established and well recognized practice in the field of International arbitration. But normally parties cannot vest jurisdiction to a court, by consent when the said court does not have a jurisdiction by law.
Read more →
In most of the countries, if an intention of the party to go for arbitration can be traced from the dispute resolution clause between the parties, that clause is treated as a valid Arbitration clause.
Read more →
In a recent Judgement of the Delhi High Court dated 07 th November 2017 in a case between Emaar MGF land Limited Vs Aftab Singh reported as 2017 SCC Online Del 11437, High court dealt with an application filed under S.37(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996.
Read more →
The globally recognized foundation of arbitration is " party autonomy " because parties come forward to waive off their rights to approach the national courts. Party autonomy is not a simple decorative phrase; it is almost absolute in nature.
Read more →
India has amended its procedural law, Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 by an amending Act, Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act,2015 with effect from 23 rd October 2015.
Read more →
2015 Amendment Act to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 brought in many changes to ensure impartiality and independence of the Arbitrators. The above said Amendment Act, came into force on 23 rd October 2015.
Read more →
In India Arbitration and Conciliation felids are governed by Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 (The Act). The said Act determines the procedural aspect of Arbitration and Conciliation proceedings seated in India including the confidentiality of the documents.
Read more →
In a recent Judgment Union of India Vs Vodafone Group PLC United Kingdom (2017) SCC Online Delhi 9930 dated 22 nd August 2017, Delhi High Court granted injunction restraining Vodafone Group PLC United Kingdom from taking any action in furtherance of the notice dated 15 th June 2015 and notice of Arb
Read more →No items on this page match your filter.
Stay up to date with the significant developments in Indian arbitration and commercial law that affect your business.
In Compliance with Indian Regulations, Kindly Review the User Acknowledgement and Disclaimer below and then Proceed.
By proceeding further and clicking on the "ACCEPT" button herein below, I acknowledge that I of my own accord wish to know more about Law Senate (LS) for my own information and use. I further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from Law Senate (LS) or any of its members to create an Attorney-Client relationship through this website. I further acknowledge having read and understood the Disclaimer below
This website (www.lawsenate.com) is a resource for informational purposes only and is intended, but not promised or guaranteed, to be correct, complete, and up-to-date. Law Senate (LS) does not warrant that the information contained on this website is accurate or complete, and hereby disclaims any and all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident or any other cause. Law Senate (LS) further assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the information contained on this website, nor does it offer a warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The owner/Partners of this website do not intend links from this site to other internet websites to be referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with the linked entities. Law Senate (LS) is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties about, the contents of Web sites to which links may be provided from this Web site.
This website is not intended to be a source of advertising or solicitation and the contents of the website should not be construed as legal advice. The reader should not consider this information to be an invitation for a lawyer-client relationship and should not rely on information provided herein and should always seek the advice of competent counsel licensed to practice in the reader's country/state. Transmission, receipt or use of this website does not constitute or create a lawyer-client relationship. No recipients of content from this website should act, or refrain from acting, based upon any or all of the contents of this site.
Furthermore, the owner of this website does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based solely upon viewing this Web site or in a country/state where this website fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state. Finally, the reader is warned that the use of Internet e-mail for confidential or sensitive information is susceptible to risks of lack of confidentiality associated with sending email over the Internet.
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, lawyers are not permitted to advertise themselves. The information about the Firm, its Key Practice Areas or its Key Team Members provided under this website is only for informational purposes and it should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement of any nature whatsoever.
The information provided on this website is for general information only. It is not intended to create or promote an attorney-client relationship and does not constitute and should not be relied upon or construed as legal advice.
Communications via this website also do not create an attorney-client relationship. Visitor should always seek appropriate professional advice before acting on the basis of any information contained herein.
